The Analysis of the Relationship Between East and West in Orhan Pamuk’s Whıte Castle Through Lévi-Strauss’s Method of Binary Oppositions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17009570Keywords:
East-West Binary Oppositions, White Castle, Orhan Pamuk, Post-modern Novel, Levi StraussAbstract
Binary opposition is a major concept in structuralism, which posits that distinctions form the basis of all language and thought. French anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss classifies the human mind using binary opposition, which refers to the distinctions between two opposing concepts that define society in terms of good and evil. This structuralist theory indicates that our understanding of certain words depends on the difference between the word and its opposite rather than the meaning they contain. Orhan Pamuk's most famous novel, White Castle, uses binary oppositions as world balancers. White Castle, considered a post-modern tale, is rich in binary opposition. The novel focuses on the east-west binary, cultural identity, and differences. The author addresses universal and historical issues, particularly the synthesis of east and west, which conveys two similar characters from opposite cultures, as well as other oppositions between these characters. This study aims to interpret east and west in terms of binary oppositions. Throughout the novel, the two contrasting characters attempt to understand each other's identities by focusing on binaries such as 'me' and 'other', 'east-west', and 'master-slave'. This article aims to explain how Pamuk examines the differences and similarities of these binaries in White Castle, in line with Levi Strauss' method of binary oppositions.
Downloads
References
Akman, B. (2018). Orientalism in Orhan Pamuk’s White Castle. Bilig: Turkish Journal of Social Sciences of the Turkic World, (85), 27–45.
Cengiz, S. (2010). East–West dilemma in Orhan Pamuk’s Novels. HUTAD: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 27, xx–xx.
Göknar, E. (2006). Orhan Pamuk and the ‘Ottoman’ Theme. World Literature Today, 80(6), 34–38.
Güllük, D. (2020). White Castle from the perspective of the master–slave dialectic and the self and the other concept. Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 65, xx–xx.
Hashemipour, S. (2017). Life into Literature: Orhan Pamuk in His Works. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 4(2), 213–221.
Koçakoğlu, B. (2010). A Narration For the Traditional Side of Postmodernism: Beyaz Kale. HUTAD: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 29, xx–xx.
Okur, N. (Ed.). (n.d.). Essays interpreting the writings of novelist Orhan Pamuk. İletişim Publishing.
Pamuk, O. (1999). Other Colors: Essays and a story (M. Freely, Trans.). İletişim Yayınları.
Pamuk, O. (2009). The White Castle (M. Freely, Trans.). Vintage Publishing. (Original work published 1985)
S. P. Anuja, N. Asharudeen, & K. Pramila. (2017). Representing the microcosm in the visionary aspirations of identity in Orhan Pamuk’s The White Castle. [Journal Name], xx(xx), xx–xx.
Taş, S. (2016). Ferit hidden in Orhan is in the White Castle. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), xx–xx.
Yaprak, T. (2013). Novel Characters Writing Orhan Pamuk’s Novels. Journal of Academic Social Science, 2(16), 258–269.
Yıldırım, Ç. (2011). In an Archetypal Journey, in the Form of a Narcissistic Book: The White Castle. Academic Review of Humanities, 3(1), 55–67.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 EUROASIA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.